Oct
30
Further Thoughts on a Taxonomy of Verbo-Visual Art
Over a year ago, I posited a simple three-point taxonomy of verbo-visual art, any art that depends significantly upon the combination of the visual and the textual for its esthetic effects.1 Tonight, I would like to re-examine that taxonomy, point out its inherent weaknesses2, and note why I still think that this taxonomy adequately makes sense of this range of art. Let’s begin by reviewing the three categories:
1. Visual poetry (visually charged works with at least some textual content delivered in small quantities)
2. Visual prose (visually arranged prose, which may include visual fiction or non-fiction)
3. Comics (including comic strips, comic books, and graphic novels)
Of these three, comics are the easiest to define.
1. Visual poetry (visually charged works with at least some textual content delivered in small quantities)
2. Visual prose (visually arranged prose, which may include visual fiction or non-fiction)
3. Comics (including comic strips, comic books, and graphic novels)
Of these three, comics are the easiest to define.